Normal Ultrasound Findings and Complications of Breast Implants in Colombia

Authors

  • Valentina Múnera Orozco Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana CEDIMED
  • Ximena Saldarriaga Jaramillo CEDIMED, Medellin
  • Catalina Mejía Soto Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana - CEDIMED

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53903/01212095.21

Keywords:

Breast implants, Ultrasonography mammary, Incidental finding

Abstract

Implant augmentation mammoplasty and post-mastectomy breast reconstruction are some of the most frequent surgical procedures in plastic surgery. Breast implants are among the medical devices with the highest amount of reports of adverse events in our country. In suspicion of rupture, removal is the gold standard. However, there is little clarity regarding which strategies and images are adequate for non-invasive evaluation. High resolution ultrasound has shown to be an alternative for the initial evaluation. Due to the variability of the implants it is necessary to recognize their imaging characteristics. This article presents the findings of the ultrasound of the implants, including those that can be generated by tags or marks distinctive of the brand and those of the most common complications associated with them.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andrade E. Implantes mamarios de fijación. (Trabajo presentado en el Concurso de investigación, tecnología y ciencias básicas del XXXVI Congreso Nacional SCCP, Cartagena 2017). RCCP. 2018;24(2):4.

Barbosa E. Nuevos horizontes de los implantes mamarios en la epoca del LACG. Página Resid. 2019;25(1):2.

Rocco N, Rispoli C, Moja L, Amato B, Iannone L, Testa S, et al. Different types of implants for reconstructive breast surgery. Cochrane Breast Cancer Group, editor. Cochrane Database Syst Rev [Internet]. 16 de mayo de 2016 [citado 5 de marzo de 2020]. Disponible en: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/14651858.CD010895.pub2

McNamara MP, Middleton MS. Ultrasound of breast implants and soft tissue silicone. Ultrasound Clin. 2011;6(3):345-68.

Shah A, Jankharia B. Imaging of common breast implants and implant-related complications: A pictorial essay. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2016;26(2):216.

INVIMA. 966 Reportes de prótesis mamarias se han presentado en los últimos 10 años [Internet]. 2019. Disponible en: https://www.invima.gov.co/966-reportes-de-protesismamarias-se-han-presentado-en-los-ultimos-10-anos.

Bengtson BP, Eaves FF. High-resolution ultrasound in the detection of silicone gel breast implant shell failure: Background, in vitro studies, and early clinical results. Aesthet Surg J. 2012;32(2):157-74.

Brown SL, Silverman BG, Berg WA. Rupture of silicone-gel breast implants: causes, sequelae, and diagnosis. Lancet Lond Engl. 1997;350(9090):1531-7.

Benito-Ruiz J, de Cabo F. Ultrasonography: A useful tool for plastic surgeons. Aesthetic Plast Surg [Internet]. 19 de marzo de 2014 [citado 2 de abril de 2020]. Disponible en: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00266-014-0300-z.

Cilotti A, Marini C, Iacconi C, Mazzotta D, Moretti M, Giaconi C, et al. Ultrasonographic Appearance of Breast Implant Complications. Ann Plast Surg. 2006;56(3):243-7.

Sieber DA, Stark RY, Chase S, Schafer M, Adams WP. Clinical evaluation of shaped gel breast implant rotation using high-resolution ultrasound. Aesthet Surg J. 2017;37(3):290-6.

Juanpere S, Pérez E, Huc O, Motos N, Pont J, Pedraza S. Imaging of breast implants—a pictorial review. Insights Imaging. 2011;2(6):653-70.

Sampaio Góes JC. Breast implant stability in the subfascial plane and the new shaped silicone gel breast implants. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2010;34(1):23-8.

Hahn M, Kuner RP, Scheler P, Freidel K, Hoffmann G, Madjar H, et al. Sonographic criteria for the confirmation of implant rotation and the development of an implantcapsule-interaction (“interface”) in anatomically formed textured breast implants with texturised Biocell-surface. Ultraschall Med Stuttg Ger 1980. 2008;29(4):399-404.

Klang E, Yosepovich A, Krosser A, Soffer S, Halshtok Neiman O, Shalmon A, et al. Detection of pathologically proven silicone lymphadenopathy: ultrasonography versus magnetic resonance imaging: Imaging of silicone lymphadenopathy. J Ultrasound Med. 2018;37(4):969-75.

Caskey CI, Berg WA, Hamper UM, Sheth S, Chang BW, Anderson ND. Imaging spectrum of extracapsular silicone: Correlation of US, MR imaging, mammographic, and histopathologic findings. RadioGraphics. 1999;19(suppl 1):S39-51.

Dragoumis D, Assimaki A, Vrizas T, Tsiftsoglou A. Axillary silicone lymphadenopathy secondary to augmentation mammaplasty. Indian J Plast Surg. 2010;43(2):206.

Published

2020-09-30

How to Cite

(1)
Múnera Orozco, V. .; Saldarriaga Jaramillo, X.; Mejía Soto, C. . Normal Ultrasound Findings and Complications of Breast Implants in Colombia. Rev. colomb. radiol. 2020, 31, 5396-5402.

Issue

Section

Review articles
Crossref Cited-by logo
QR Code